Activities
On receipt of a complaint against any officials of NCTE, a letter is sent to the concerned person for confirmation to the complainant
-On receipt of the confirmation from the complainants, a fact finding committee constituted with the approval of the Chief Vigilance Officer/Competent Authority
-After receipt of the report from the fact finding committee , start action against the concerned officer/official
-On non-receipt of the confirmation within the stipulated time, a reminder sends
An non receipt of the reminder, and after further examination, file processed for closure as per the CVC guidelines
On the punitive side:
-
To ensure speedy processing of vigilance cases at all stages. In regard to cases requiring consultation with the Central Vigilance Commission, a decision as to whether the case had a vigilance angle shall in every case be taken by the CVO who, when in doubt, may refer the matter to his administrative head, i.e. Secretary in the case of Ministries/Departments and Chief Executive in the case of public sector organisations;
-
To ensure that charge-sheet, statement of imputations, lists of witness and documents etc. are carefully prepared and copies of all the documents relied upon and the statements of witnesses cited on behalf of the disciplinary authority are supplied wherever possible to the accused officer alongwith the charge-sheet;
-
ensure that all documents required to be forwarded to the Inquiring Officer are carefully sorted out and sent promptly;
-
To ensure that there is no delay in the appointment of the Inquiring Officer, and that no dilatory tactics are adopted by the accused officer or the Presenting Officer;
-
To ensure that the processing of the Inquiry Officer’s Reports for final orders of the Disciplinary Authority is done properly and quickly;
-
To scrutinise final orders passed by the Disciplinary Authorities subordinate to the Ministry/Department, with a view to see whether a case for review is made out or not;
-
To see that proper assistance is given to the C.B.I. in the investigation of cases entrusted to them or started by them on their own source of information;
-
To take proper and adequate action with regard to writ petitions filed by accused officers;
-
To ensure that the Central Vigilance Commission is consulted at all stages where it is to be consulted and that as far as possible, the time limits prescribed in the Vigilance Manual for various stages are adhered to;
-
To ensure prompt submission of returns to the Commission;
-
To review from time to time the existing arrangements for vigilance work in the Ministry/Department for vigilance work subordinate officers to see if they are adequate to ensure expeditious and effective disposal of vigilance work;
-
To ensure that the competent disciplinary authorities do not adopt a dilatory or law attitude in processing vigilance cases, thus knowingly otherwise helping the subject public servants, particularly in cases of officers due to retire;
-
To ensure that cases against the public servants on the verge of retirement do not lapse due to time-limit for reasons such as misplacement of files etc. and that the orders passed in the cases of retiring officers are implemented in time; and
-
To ensure that the period from the date of serving a charge-sheet in a disciplinary case to the submission of the report of the Inquiry Officer, should, ordinarily, not exceed six months.